The agent, running in your environment
Not a notebook and not a demo. It runs on your infrastructure against your real data, with logging you can read.
You get an agent that does the actual job in production, with the guardrails that stop it from doing the job wrong, and the source code to run it without me.
A scoped custom AI agent costs $2,000 to $5,000 and takes 2 to 4 weeks. That covers the agent itself, the tool integrations it needs, the verification gates that catch bad output before it ships, and full documentation. The quote is fixed before work starts, and you own all the source code at handoff.
Not a notebook and not a demo. It runs on your infrastructure against your real data, with logging you can read.
The difference between an agent you trust and one you re-check by hand. Every output passes a programmatic check before it reaches a human or a customer.
The agent connects to the systems you already run, whether that is a CRM, a database, an internal API, or a spreadsheet somebody refuses to give up.
You own everything. Nothing is held hostage behind a retainer, and a different developer can pick it up.
These are my own numbers, on my own systems, with the measurement date and instrument named so you can re-run them. They are not client case studies, because I will not put a testimonial on this page before I have one worth quoting.
A live trading bot with monitoring, kill switches, and evidence gates on every parameter change. I do not build agents for clients that I would not run against my own capital.
Measured across my own delivered builds, not an aspirational timeline. Scope is fixed in writing first, which is the only reason the estimate holds.
| This engagement | A typical AI agency | A no-code agent platform | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical cost | $2,000 to $5,000, fixed | $25,000 to $60,000 plus change orders | |
| Time to a running agent | 2 to 4 weeks | 3 to 6 months | |
| Who writes the code | The person you talked to | A junior assigned after the pitch | |
| What you own at handoff | All source, docs, runbooks | A licence, often a hosted black box | |
| Failure handling | Verification gates and logs by default | Usually a later phase, quoted separately | |
| Runs without the vendor | Yes, that is the handoff | No, that is the business model | |
The range is scope, not negotiation room. A single-purpose agent with two integrations sits near the bottom; a multi-step agent with human review and a dashboard sits near the top.
Start with a scoping call →Or email hello@chudi.dev directly.
NO DISCOVERY-CALL FUNNEL · NO RETAINER LOCK-IN · WRITTEN SCOPE BEFORE ANY INVOICE
A scoped production agent runs $2,000 to $5,000. That is a fixed quote agreed in writing after a scoping call, not an hourly estimate that drifts. Simpler single-task agents can come in under that; anything that needs a full application around it moves into the custom build range starting at $5,000.
2 to 4 weeks from the scoping call to a running agent. The scope is fixed in writing before any work starts, which is the only reason that estimate holds. You see working artifacts at each checkpoint rather than waiting for a reveal at the end.
A chatbot answers. An agent acts: it calls tools, reads and writes to your systems, and completes a multi-step task without a human driving each step. That difference is why agents need verification gates and chatbots mostly do not, and it is where most agent projects fail.
Yes, entirely. Full source, documentation, runbooks, and a recorded walkthrough at handoff. There is no licence, no hosted black box, and no retainer required to keep it running. A different developer can pick it up without talking to me.
Ask any candidate three questions: what happens when the agent produces a wrong answer, what exactly do I own at handoff, and can I see something running rather than a deck. Firms that answer those clearly are worth talking to, whether or not that is me.
That is usually the whole point. The agent connects to the CRM, database, internal API, or spreadsheet you already run. If a system has no API, I will say so during scoping rather than discovering it in week three.